Search ↗

Comparison

GHRP-2 vs Ipamorelin

Both are gHRPs & ghrelin mimetics, so the meaningful differences are in kinetics, evidence and regulatory status.

On published evidence alone, GHRP-2 is the better documented of the two (clinical trials). That is a statement about the state of the literature, not a recommendation.

GHRP-2 Ipamorelin
Class GHRPs & ghrelin mimetics GHRPs & ghrelin mimetics
Evidence Clinical trials Preliminary human
Human trials ~12 ~5
Half-life ~30 minutes ~2 hours
Reported range 100-300 mcg 200-300 mcg
Frequency 2-3x daily 1-3x daily, on an empty stomach
Routes Subcutaneous, Intramuscular, Intranasal Subcutaneous
FDA approved No No
Research use only Yes Yes
Banned in sport Yes Yes
Studied for GH secretory testing, Growth hormone elevation, Appetite stimulation Growth hormone elevation, Recovery, Sleep quality, Body composition
Reported side effects Increased appetite, Elevated cortisol and prolactin, Water retention, Tiredness Head rush on injection, Transient hunger, Water retention, Lethargy

GHRP-2

GHRP-2 is a synthetic hexapeptide agonist at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. It produces a larger GH pulse than ipamorelin at comparable doses, but with measurable increases in cortisol and prolactin, which is the trade-off that defines its position in the class. It is approved in Japan under the name pralmorelin as a diagnostic test of pituitary GH reserve.

Ipamorelin

Ipamorelin is a pentapeptide agonist at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor, the same receptor targeted by endogenous ghrelin. Unlike the earlier GHRPs it produces a GH pulse without meaningful elevation of adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol or prolactin, which is the basis of its reputation as the cleanest compound in the class. It is short-acting and is typically dosed alongside a GHRH analog to exploit the synergy between the two receptor pathways.

GHRP-2 vs Ipamorelin: common questions

What is the difference between GHRP-2 and Ipamorelin?

Both are gHRPs & ghrelin mimetics. GHRP-2: A potent ghrelin-receptor agonist approved in Japan as a diagnostic agent, with a stronger GH pulse than ipamorelin and more hormonal spillover. Ipamorelin: The most receptor-selective of the growth-hormone-releasing peptides, notable for leaving cortisol and prolactin essentially unchanged.

Which has stronger evidence, GHRP-2 or Ipamorelin?

GHRP-2 has the stronger evidence base (clinical trials, about 12 human studies) compared with Ipamorelin (preliminary human).

Are GHRP-2 and Ipamorelin FDA approved?

Neither is FDA approved for any indication.

References

Regulatory and primary sources

  1. PubChem compound record (CID 6918245) ↗ · structure, identifiers, synonyms
  2. WADA Prohibited List ↗ · current year
  3. FDA: Unapproved drugs and "research use only" products ↗ · regulatory status of non-approved products
  4. CAS Registry Number 158861-67-7 ↗ · chemical identity
  5. PubChem compound record (CID 9831659) ↗ · structure, identifiers, synonyms
  6. CAS Registry Number 170851-70-4 ↗ · chemical identity

Published literature

  1. Ghigo E, Arvat E, Muccioli G, et al.. Growth hormone-releasing peptides.Eur J Endocrinol 1997.PubMed 9186261 · doi:10.1530/eje.0.1360445
  2. Fukuda I, Hizuka N, Muraoka T, et al.. Adult growth hormone deficiency: current concepts.Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2014.PubMed 25070016 · doi:10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0088
  3. Pralmorelin: GHRP 2, GPA 748, growth hormone-releasing peptide 2, KP-102 D, KP-102 LN, KP-102D, KP-102LN.Drugs R D 2004.PubMed 15230633 · doi:10.2165/00126839-200405040-00011
  4. Camanni F, Ghigo E, Arvat E. Growth hormone-releasing peptides and their analogs.Front Neuroendocrinol 1998.PubMed 9465289 · doi:10.1006/frne.1997.0158
  5. Vodnik M, Štrukelj B, Lunder M. Ghrelin Receptor Ligands Reaching Clinical Trials: From Peptides to Peptidomimetics; from Agonists to Antagonists.Horm Metab Res 2016.PubMed 26551992 · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1564149
  6. Muccioli G, Broglio F, Valetto MR, et al.. Growth hormone-releasing peptides and the cardiovascular system.Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2000.PubMed 10790589
  7. Celichowska M, Miedziaszczyk M, Lacka K. Pharmacotherapy in Cachexia: A Review of Endocrine Abnormalities and Steroid Pharmacotherapy.J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2022.PubMed 35758863 · doi:10.1080/15360288.2022.2063469
  8. Argente J, García-Segura LM, Pozo J, et al.. Growth hormone-releasing peptides: clinical and basic aspects.Horm Res 1996.PubMed 8950613 · doi:10.1159/000185015
  9. Mayfield CK, Bolia IK, Feingold CL, et al.. Injectable Peptide Therapy: A Primer for Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Physicians.Am J Sports Med 2026.PubMed 41476424 · doi:10.1177/03635465251357593
  10. Rahman OF, Lee SJ, Seeds WA. Therapeutic Peptides in Orthopaedics: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2026.PubMed 41490200 · doi:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00236
  11. Mendias CL, Awan TM. Safety and Efficacy of Approved and Unapproved Peptide Therapies for Musculoskeletal Injuries and Athletic Performance.Sports Med 2026.PubMed 41966639 · doi:10.1007/s40279-026-02437-0
  12. Renke G, Chinellato L. Therapeutic Peptides in Aesthetic, Metabolic and Endocrine Conditions: Effects, Safety, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives.Int J Mol Sci 2026.PubMed 42123471 · doi:10.3390/ijms27093890
  13. Coutinho LFD, DE Oliveira Neves LF, Camilo RP. A new era of doping? Use of peptide and peptide-analog drugs in recreational and professional sport and bodybuilding: a critical review.J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2026.PubMed 41880199 · doi:10.23736/S0022-4707.26.17773-1
  14. Gobburu JV, Agersø H, Jusko WJ, et al.. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of ipamorelin, a growth hormone releasing peptide, in human volunteers.Pharm Res 1999.PubMed 10496658 · doi:10.1023/a:1018955126402
  15. Beck DE, Sweeney WB, McCarter MD, et al.. Prospective, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept study of the Ghrelin mimetic ipamorelin for the management of postoperative ileus in bowel resection patients.Int J Colorectal Dis 2014.PubMed 25331030 · doi:10.1007/s00384-014-2030-8
  16. Villegas Meza AD, Nocek M, Mitchell BC, et al.. Injectable Peptides in Sports Medicine: A Structured Narrative Review of Evidence, Safety, and Antidoping Implications.JBJS Rev 2026.PubMed 42160466 · doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.26.00027

Literature retrieved from PubMed on October 16, 2026, favouring human studies and reviews. Numbered markers in the text show which paper supports which statement; uncited entries are background reading.

Read this first This page compares published reference data. It is not medical advice and not a recommendation to use either compound. Several compounds documented on this site are not approved for human use.