Search ↗

Clinics

Bloodwork & longevity telehealth

Which panel to get first, what each one measures, and what happens after the results.

8 providers offer this. 5 include labs in the price. 0 accept insurance. Figures reflect what each provider publishes. * = provisional score.

Highest-scored providers

Ranked guides

All providers

ClinicScoreConsultLabsPrescriberInsuranceFrom
InsideTracker logoInsideTracker
A blood-biomarker and wearable-data platform producing personalised nutrition and lifestyle recommendations. Testing and insights, not treatment.
10.0 — Included MD/DO — $489 first year
Superpower logoSuperpower
An annual-membership health platform combining a broad lab panel with a clinician-reviewed action plan.
8.9 Async Included MD/DO + NP/PA Cash $199/yr
Marek Health Also offers
A telehealth clinic built around comprehensive bloodwork and physician-guided hormone optimisation, with TRT, peptide therapy and GLP-1 programmes. Known for an unusually deep lab panel.
7.1 Hybrid Extra MD/DO + NP/PA Cash $299
OneTwenty logoOneTwenty
Bloodwork-led longevity and hormone optimisation telehealth, with physician-guided TRT, GLP-1 weight management and peptide therapy built on comprehensive lab panels.
9.2* — Included — Cash $499/yr membership
Hone Health logoHone Health Also offers
A large men’s hormone telehealth provider offering at-home lab testing, TRT and enclomiphene protocols, with a subscription model and physician video consults.
6.9* Video Extra MD/DO Cash $65 initial lab test
Ways2Well logoWays2Well Also offers
A functional-medicine telehealth clinic offering bloodwork-driven hormone optimisation, TRT, peptide therapy and GLP-1 weight loss.
6.8* Video Included — Cash $125/mo Core care plan
Opt Health logoOpt Health Also offers
A men’s preventive-health telehealth provider combining comprehensive bloodwork with TRT and sexual health treatment under a physician.
5.4* Video Extra MD/DO + NP/PA Cash $95/mo
Function Health logoFunction Health
An annual-membership lab-testing service running a very large biomarker panel with physician-written results summaries. Testing and insights, not treatment.
Not scored — Included — Cash $365/yr

Head-to-head comparisons

Tools for this decision

What these clinics prescribe

Reference records for the compounds offered in this category. Mechanism, dosing ranges, evidence level and regulatory status for each.

References

Regulatory and primary sources

  1. CMS: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) ↗ · federal standards for clinical labs
  2. HHS: Telehealth for patients ↗ · what to expect from a telehealth visit
  3. FDA: BeSafeRx, buying medicine online safely ↗ · how to check an online pharmacy
  4. NABP: Safe.Pharmacy verified websites ↗ · pharmacy accreditation lookup
  5. FSMB DocInfo: physician license lookup ↗ · check a prescriber is licensed
  6. FTC: Endorsements, influencers and reviews ↗ · disclosure rules for affiliate links

Published literature

  1. Horton R, Crawford G, Freeman L, et al.. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.BMJ 2019.PubMed 31619392 · doi:10.1136/bmj.l5688
  2. O'Daniel JM, Kobelka C, Foss K, et al.. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.NEJM Evid 2025.PubMed 41147825 · doi:10.1056/EVIDra2400455
  3. Orth M, Sandberg S, Shih P. Direct-to-Consumer Testing: Benefits and Concerns of Commercially Accessed Laboratory Tests.Clin Chem 2025.PubMed 39964351 · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvaf004
  4. Nugent LF, Haney NM, Kohn TP. Home sperm testing-increasing uses for direct-to-consumer tests.Fertil Steril 2023.PubMed 36502933 · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.010
  5. Majumder MA, Guerrini CJ, McGuire AL. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk.Annu Rev Med 2021.PubMed 32735764 · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-070119-114727
  6. Howard HC, Borry P. Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing.Pharmacogenomics 2011.PubMed 22008043 · doi:10.2217/pgs.11.100
  7. Li M, Diamandis EP, Grenache D, et al.. Direct-to-Consumer Testing.Clin Chem 2017.PubMed 27993938 · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2016.260349
  8. Chadwick R. Direct to consumer testing, drugs and gifts.Bioethics 2020.PubMed 32100331 · doi:10.1111/bioe.12734

Literature retrieved from PubMed on October 18, 2026, favouring human studies and reviews. Numbered markers in the text show which paper supports which statement; uncited entries are background reading.